TransformXperience · The Operating Model

The AGE Diagnostic™

Are you governing well enough to trust what you built?

The governance you designed and the governance running today are not the same thing. They drifted apart the moment the work moved, and nothing on your calendar is measuring the gap.

Begin your AGE Diagnostic

This is where you see the gap. Built on the AGE Framework, our Adaptive Governance Engine, the diagnostic reads your operating model through three lenses, Structure, Guardrails, and Signals, and shows you where each is thin or already drifting, before a decision or a failure finds it first. Fifteen questions, under ten minutes.

✓Adaptive · read through the Signals lens
✓Scored per dimension, out of 25
✓Governance · read through the Structure lens
✓Overall read, out of 75
✓Execution · read through the Guardrails lens
✓Where your fabric is thin, and the next move

We respect your privacy. No spam, ever.

0 / 15 answered
A
Adaptive · read through the Signals lens
Do you watch production, catch drift, and move your stance when the business moves?
1.We watch what our AI and automated systems do in production, not only what they were approved to do at launch.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
2.We can detect when the system we run has drifted from the system we documented.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
3.Governance health shows up as measurable signals, such as coverage, data-boundary adherence, alert closure, and decision latency, not as opinion.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
4.When the model, the regulation, or the technology shifts, our governance stance moves with it instead of staying fixed.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
5.We catch governance incidents early and tie what the system does back to a business outcome.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
Adaptive score: – / 25
G
Governance · read through the Structure lens
Are decision rights, roles, and accountability defined and connected across the organization?
1.We have named owners with clear decision rights for AI and technology governance at the strategic, operational, and technical levels.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
2.When an AI or automated system produces a wrong or harmful outcome, it is clear who answers for it.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
3.Approving a new AI use case, model, or data connection follows a defined path with a named approver.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
4.Governance responsibilities are written into role definitions and the org chart, not carried informally by a few individuals.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
5.Our governance holds together across legal, IT, security, and operations rather than each function holding a separate piece.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
Governance score: – / 25
E
Execution · read through the Guardrails lens
Do your rules live inside the actual workflow and tooling, or sit in a binder no one opens?
1.Our governance rules and standards are enforced inside the actual workflows and tooling, not only written in policy.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
2.New AI initiatives run through the same intake and change processes we already use, extended with targeted checks.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
3.A control we agree to in one quarter continues to bind new models, connectors, and applications added later.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
4.Our controls are versioned and tied to the business drivers and risk posture behind them.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
5.High-risk events, such as a new use case, a sensitive data access, or a major configuration change, trigger a predefined governance action on their own.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
Execution score: – / 25
Answer all 15 questions to unlock your results.
– / 75

See what these scores mean for your next 90 days

The Executive Readiness Session applies the AGE Framework to your context and returns a ranked set of changes you can make in the next 90 days. Bring your diagnostic; we will read it together.

See the Executive Readiness Session